'We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.'
- Jens Orback
STOCKHOLM, Sweden, Feb. 8 (UPI) -- A Swedish court ruled Monday in favor of a Muslim man who lost unemployment benefits after refusing a female executive's handshake, court documents indicate. Stockholm District Court ordered Sweden's National Public Employment Agency to pay $8,000 to the man, who was withdrawn from a labor market training program after refusing the handshake at a company with which he was going to intern, The Local reported.
The court ruled the agency knew the man's religious convictions prevented him from shaking hands with women he did not know. The company decided to cancel the internship offer, saying he did not have required skills and experience. The agency dropped him from the training program and as a result the man lost his job seeker's allowance in May 2006. He reported the experience to Sweden's Discrimination Ombudsman, who found in the man's favor.
The court ordered the payment in compensation for violation of religious freedom. Although the violation appeared to have occurred unintentionally, the court said, the man had as a result suffered significant consequences and financial loss.
$8000 for insulting a woman - yet another example of dhimmis paying the jizya (protection money) in response to lawfare and litigation jihad.
So discrimination against invading Muslims trumps discrimination against Swedish women?
Sweden is in as bad a state as Britanistan - if not worse. Islamically motivated rape and sadistic sexual humiliation of women and children have reached epidemic proportions.
Jens Orback, Minister for Democracy, Metropolitan Affairs, Integration and Gender Equality from the Social Democratic Party said "We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us."
Sorry Mr Orback, it doesn't work like that - there's no ethics of reciprocity in Islam. Instead there's a system of give and take: We give, they take.
Muslims inhabit a different moral universe from the rest of us, where good is evil and evil is good, if it serves the purposes of Islam.
While other religions teach goodwill to mankind, Islam teaches hostility to all non-members of the cult.
Jesus, in the parable of the Good Samaritan, taught his followers to help all people in need, irrespective of their religion. Jews are commanded to be a light unto the nations. The Buddha taught compassion for all suffering beings.
But in Islam, charity applies only to fellow Muslims, and in fact many Islamic charities are money-launderers for jihad.There is no Golden Rule in Islam. There is no place for conscience in Islam. Peel away the thin veneer of religiosity, and all you find is vicious, primitive, predatory tribalism, with Swedish women being prime targets for this savagery.
As well as the various forms of organized premeditated jihad, Muslims are psychologically primed to be opportunist jihadists, spontaneously attacking their prey like packs of hyenas as soon as they sense they have the numerical advantage. Islam legitimizes and encourages predatory attacks on infidels.
This kind of spontaneous, opportunistic jihad is exemplified by the 'Street Jihad' attacks in Europe, and Islamic gang rapes such as that of Lara Logan.
Most religions have a restraining influence on anti-social behavior, but Islam has precisely the opposite effect due to deliberate destruction of the conscience.
Islam incites and excuses crime against infidels. Because of their arrogant sense of supremacy and automatic entitlement, Muslims regard infidels not as fellow human beings, but as walking opportunities for plunder , parasitism and rape.
Islam is not a religion. It is an international criminal conspiracy like the Mafia .
Why we must stop legitimizing Muslim grievances
'There is no surer path to Muslim violence than through the legitimization of Muslim grievance. And once you accept the legitimacy of the grievance, then you are also bound to accept the legitimacy of the violence that follows.
Violence begins with grievance. Grievance is the pretext for violence and the narrative for the violence. Liberals make a fetish of separating the grievance from the violence, emphasizing constructive means of resolving the grievance. But what do you do when the grievance and the violence are inseparable?
Grievance is the stories that Muslims tell themselves to justify their violence. To explain why they kill children and why they murder the innocent. The list of grievances is an endless as the violence. Every act of violence carries its own narrative. The endless Muslim conflicts throughout the world all carry their burden of history. But it isn't a history that can be resolved with a tolerance session... More