Thursday, 11 February 2010

Labour has deliberately destroyed British National identity.

Labour hate, detest and fear the the English working class

'The English are potentially very
aggressive, very violent" - Jack Straw



So this is what they've been doing for the past twelve years
...
".....replacing traditional pride with inherited guilt: all of this could be facilitated by a large influx of migrants whose presence in the population would require the wholesale deconstruction of the country's sense of its own identity."

"New Labour tide brought with it in the beginning: the contempt for history and the Year Zero arrogance with which they set about "modernising" the nation's institutions."


"But the subtext was always self-examination and personal guilt: the indigenous Briton must be trained (literally, by the education system) always to question the acceptability of his own attitudes, to cast doubt on his own motives, to condemn his own national identity and history, to accept the blame even for the misbehaviour of new migrants – whose conduct could only be a reflection of the unfortunate way they were treated by the host population."
- Green Arrow

Hidden agenda
When the Labour control freaks came to power twelve years ago they had a secret agenda to destroy British identity and national pride, with Englishness as public enemy number one.

At the time of their election victory, anyone who suggested that Labour were setting out on a deliberate campaign of nation-wrecking would have been regarded as a loony conspiracy theorist. But recently overwhelming evidence has emerged showing that this was their intention all along.

Politically motivated attempt to radically change the country
The first revelation of their hidden agenda came from Andrew Neather, a former government adviser

"The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its core working class vote." - Telegraph


Secret policy paper proposed a cultural jihad against Britishness
Then, confirmation came from the release of the full text of the draft policy paper composed in 2000 by a Home Office research unit – the gist of which had already been made public by a former Labour adviser – released under Freedom of Information rules. It is political dynamite.

What it states quite unequivocally was that mass immigration was being encouraged at least as much for "social objectives" as for economic ones. Migration was intended specifically to alter the demographic and cultural pattern of the country: to produce by force majeure the changes in attitude that the Labour government saw itself as representing.

Connecting the dots
Knowing what we do now, we can also make sense of a number of apparently disconnected events such as Jack Straw's anti-English ravings and the demonisation of St George's Day.

We can now see that the campaign to destroy our identity had (and still has) the following components:

- Import huge number of Labour voting Muslim immigrants.

- Muslim immigrants are especially favoured because they are unassimilable and fast-breeding.

- The resultant population explosion will eventually destroy the countryside and much of Britain's heritage, again helping to erode national pride and sense of identity.

- Give preferential cheap social housing to Muslims, while allowing the cost of commercial housing to rise astronomically. This makes finding a home and starting a family very difficult for the British working class.

- Denigrate all British achievements and history. Brainwash students with a sense of guilt about colonialism, slavery and the British Empire and completely airbrush British achievements out of history. This will ultimately produce a nation obsessed with guilt and self-loathing.

- Wreck the educational system (while ensuring Labour MP's own kids go to the best schools)

- Destroy all non-state controlled institutions where proles can meet and exchange unauthorised opinions (eg use of taxation and licensing legislation to destroy community centres such as pubs and village halls)

- Humiliate and demoralise the British working class by allowing aggressive Muslims unrestricted rights to attack and rape British children without risk of prosecution.

- All tensions are the result of inadequate community cohesion, which is the fault of the indigenous proles and must be remedied by vigorous brainwashing.

- Get the BBC (the Labour Party propaganda machine) to tell the British working class that they are worthless, while Muslims are the people of the future.

Cultural enrichment
Despite all the hype about cultural enrichment, this was never the intention. Tony B. Liar intended immigration to produce cultural impoverishment and inflict a very unpleasant experience on the hated indigenous proles, who would have 'their noses rubbed in diversity' like a puppy gets its nose rubbed into its doings - except that our noses are being rubbed into Tony B. Liar's doings, and so will our chidren's and grandchildren's.

The government predicted that crime would rise, but nevertheless went ahead with their scheme of importing millions of implacably hostile jihadist predators and parasites.


Weak horse, strong horse
But what do Labour intend to do with the Muslims once they have outnumbered the British? Do they really think they can secularise them into good socialist citizens?

As Osama bin Laden said, if people have to choose between going with the strong horse or the weak horse, they will choose the strong horse. In Britain today Islam is the strong horse, and Labour's Politically Correct Marxism is the knackered old nag. The Muslims are now getting numerous enough to know that Britain will soon be theirs without the need to co-operate with a bunch of clapped out Marxist creeps.

The damage that Labour has inflicted is irreversible. They have planted a demographic timebomb which will only wreak its full devastation when the Muslims now being born (25% of all births in Britain and rising) reach adulthood:


To appease their post-colonial guilt and self-loathing, the Metropolitan Marxist Elite have allowed millions of jihad-crazed supremacist predators into the country. But it isn't Tony B. Liar, Jack Strawman or Harridan Hormone who are getting their 'noses rubbed in diversity' - it's the long-suffering English working class.


From the Salisbury review...

"When one of my old Labour Party acquaintances expressed anxiety over Islamic terrorism, I asked him why he had always been so keen on getting as many immigrants here as possible. A case of foreigner good: Brit bad, immigrants had all the desirable qualities and every one of them would be a great asset to this country. He told me that he had been ‘trying to make the revolution’. So, while it had not been possible to storm Buckingham Palace and set up Soviets in Westminster, you could still change the population and supplant the hated ‘other’. Ironically, it happened that the flesh and blood other was not made up of filthy capitalists or parasitic aristocrats, but the ordinary working class people we had grown up among, and for and with whom, socialism would create a new world. [...]

Throughout the decades of mass immigration the claim has ever been that migrants just take the jobs we do not want or cannot fill. In the ’60s and ’70s it was also the houses; I recall teenagers in a civics class shouting at a teacher who was trying to counter their toe-curling racism by saying that the Caribbeans moving into their streets were simply occupying houses nobody wanted. ‘We want them’, ‘we live in them’, ‘what’s wrong with them?’ the boys yelled.

What may have been wrong was that the indigenous population was not being divested of them fast enough in reparation for the sins of Empire. Labour MP Frank Dobson spoke to a mainly Bangladeshi audience in Tower Hamlets a few years ago and urged them to help themselves to benefits, education, services, housing and much, much more. All we had was rightfully theirs and we could never compensate enough for our past oppression. Dobson is one heir of that political alliance of the new left with minorities which became active in local politics from the mid 1970s. This alliance enabled white radicals to portray themselves as part of the international movement combating imperialism, with the world’s black and brown people, the downtrodden proletariat.

The New East End by Kate Gavron, Geoff Dench and Michael Young (Profile Books, £15.99) shows how life has changed over the last half century in the area of Family and Kinship in East London, since 1957. It is a dreadful story of dispossession. [...]

Cooperation between the local authorities and ethnic leaders led to blocks of flats being set aside for Bangladeshi occupation, along with a substantial proportion of new and renovated housing. Provision has come to depend upon housing associations and co-operatives, through which the local authorities collaborate with central government and local residents. Attuned to cultural sensitivities, these provide six-bedroomed houses for men with multiple wives and many children; despite angry rants to the media about housing requirements being ignored.

Strong family connections, including ties to others in Bangladesh, are useful to demonstrate a need for housing that does not apply to existing citizens. These are hard-pressed to make any case for housing at all, and are said to ‘choose’ to move out. Unless, that is, they resort to ‘strategic single parenting’. Having a child unwed may be the only route for whites to the grail of council housing. Many engage in undisclosed cohabitation which they do not want to discuss in case they lose benefits; married couples live apart to maximise entitlements and families must make their offspring ‘homeless’ if they are to stand any chance of accommodation. Not only has there been decisive support for indigent outsiders, but antipathy to married, two-parent families.

The loss of local housing-control produced sink estates along with a crescendo of applications to enter the county. In one of the most rapid settlements ever to take place in Britain, wards of Tower Hamlets where Bangladeshi occupation was virtually nil in 1991 had 40 per cent or more in 2001, as population replacement spread to neighbouring boroughs like Newham and (now) Ilford and Barking. Bangladeshi children made up one third of primary school pupils in 1981 and two thirds by 2004, as extra resources were pumped into schools with names like Bangabandhu to help minority children.

Bangladeshi respondents in The New East End recount how nobody in London has to worry where the next meal is coming from, how if you do not have a job ‘they give you money’, how you ‘can have somewhere to live, without any rent’, how your ‘children can go to school’ and, even then, they still ‘give you money’. Omitted from the text is a further observation that you are paid to have as many children as you like.

When means-tested welfare benefits increase with the number of children, they produce a very high worklessness rate. Nationally, the proportion of working age people living in workless households is highest for Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups, at 27.4 per cent in 2004, compared with 10.9 per cent for whites (where lone motherhood is concentrated). Muslims have the highest male unemployment rate at 13 per cent; three times the rate for Christian men at 4 per cent. Add to this an ‘inactivity’ rate of 31 per cent. These men are purportedly ill or disabled, as are a high proportion of Bangladeshi women, who also draw disability benefits for various mental problems. Such disparities in benefit receipt by ethnic groups raise many questions about collusion and validation, and just how much assessment is possible through the burka and in the face of ethnic awareness and anti-discrimination strictures.

With their habitat gone, there are many fewer whites in family households; the average number of children in a Bangladeshi household is more than seven times that in a white household. This helped increase the population of Tower Hamlets by 45 per cent in twenty years (national growth rate, 6 per cent). The decline in white children is steeper in Tower Hamlets than anywhere else in the country. White families are in direct competition with immigrants for scarce resources and services, especially housing and education. Those who remain often last only to the point of school transfer at eleven. Fewer children mean fewer relatives generally. Family ties no longer give white people access to those who control local resources, or links to jobs and housing. Men are no longer organised into socially useful lives as husbands and fathers, so the proportion of unwed births and lone parents among whites is also among the highest in the country, when these were lowest in the first half of the twentieth century.

A double victory for leftists and a double whammy for the white working class, who have seen their family structure smashed and their locality colonised. Highly educated ‘yuppies’ can move around freely, occupationally and geographically, and can take a high-minded view, since they are not in competition with anybody for local resources, not least because they are usually childless. Instead they can enjoy the sense of belonging to a ‘vibrant’ cosmopolitan community without any demands being made on them. It is like being on ‘one big foreign holiday’ as you eulogise — like Richard Morrison in The Times — about the cheap labour and wonderful restaurants.

The whites who oppose the rhetoric of need and rights and resent the loss of their locality are mocked as pathological inadequates who are incapable of living alongside people different from themselves. Use of the racist card both suggests that there is something wrong with the people who feel hostile and avoids the real issues. Promoting cohesion is only ever understood one way: combating white racism. No adjustment is ever demanded of newcomers who live inward-looking lives organised around a religious culture which grants little respect or merit to anyone else’s. Unlike now, immigrants had to work hard to get full admission to the nation where incorporation meant forging ties with the members of the national majority.

Middle class leftists do not learn from history and have instead been drawn by their sympathies into consolidating the rights of minorities against indigenous whites. By 1998, more whites were reporting themselves as victims of racial incidents than were reported as perpetrators. Harassment on estates has been defined by council officials in ways which effectively condones any behaviour by Bangladeshis as ‘defensive’, while white tenants are threatened with the loss of their home or delays in dealing with their claims. The fear of municipal victiminisation prevented some respondents speaking fully to the New East End researchers. In education, the bulk of conflict management is directed at white parents. As schools have become more Bangladeshi, most entrants and their parents do not speak English.

These people have been disinherited and disenfranchised and go unrepresented in a way that contravenes the basic rules of our democracy. While an elected representative is supposed to represent all those in his area, many in Tower Hamlets make it clear that they are only there for the Bangladeshis who vote them in.

Funds from the European Union to build a community centre are used to build a mosque instead. There are provisions for ‘mother tongue’ teaching to make immigrants feel at home. But when one non-Bangladeshi councillor entered a classroom to an abusive reception, he found the lesson devoted — not to Bengali — but to the development of Muslim identity around Arabic. The Muslim boys’ secondary schools are bottom for the borough; not surprising because at east a third of lesson-time is devoted to memorising the Koran. The segregation and disadvantage imposed on pupils can be blamed on them being denied chances by white racism. [...]

Galloway’s Islamofascism represents the growing identity of immigrants as members of the ummah or the worldwide community of Muslims. The old Bengali Islam, softened by local Hinduism and the Sufi tradition, is giving way to jihadist Iranian and Arab models. Its integration, not into mainstream British society, but into militant Islam, is increasingly accompanied by calls for autonomous Muslim areas governed by Sharia law. The mechanisms for government funding have already encouraged local councils to take in more immigrants than their boroughs could cope with and there is not the space for Banglatowns to expand at the same pace — whether in London or elsewhere. Yet, the influx continues, not least as spouses are brought in from the homeland — which sets integration back another generation. Many on the left still embrace untrammelled immigration and insist that the houses, education and benefits can always be found for the millions who would substantially improve their chances by coming here.

The implications for security, not just national cohesion, are terrifying. There is a growing drift into a welfare dependency shared with the lower reaches of the white population whose own lives are shrivelled by the rights culture. What opens up is the kind of prospect we see in the Middle East, where unoccupied, testosterone-fuelled young men, succoured on welfare, spend their time banging guns and making babies. Those antagonistic to their own people and society are eagerly fostering the emergence of a state within a state.

Yes, Mr Dobson, they came, they saw and they are taking it.






28 comments:

Historyscoper said...

As Muslims immigrate to the West bringing Islam and Sharia with them, to remain an Islam history ignoramuses gets more dangerous daily. Go to school online free and learn all the key facts of Islam and its 1400-year history with the Historyscoper. To get started click http://go.to/islamhistory

adrian said...

This is only half the story and i begins way before 1997, those setting up the EU knew their peoples would never surrender their sovereignty and that as long as Britain was full of Brits and Germany was full of Germans and France was full of French, there would always be the possibility that one day, the Brits, or the Spaniards or the Germans etc would want to leave the EUSSR.
So it was decided to get rid if indigenous Western Europeans.
Since 1970, pro abortion groups have been funded, every town and city now has extermination centres, misleadingly called pregnancy advice centres, where the state trained nurses whisper poisonously, it's only cells, it's only a simple procedure.

Since 1970 In Britain alone, 7.2 million abortions have been carried out.
They are now talking about Sterilising British children.
Most of those children would by now have their own children, they were our future workforce, now we are told we need migrant workers.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3zy6eqo2zE

Anonymous said...

The situation gets worse and worse every day in every way.I have been assaulted three times, not seriously but it could have been, by muslim young men. I am now on the qui vive at all times out of the house.

stephengash said...

Let's look at the title of this post

"Labour has deliberately destroyed British National identity.

Labour hate, detest and fear the the English working class"

Therein lies the problem.

I'm sick of "British" being rammed down my English throat.

Anonymous said...

Good over view of the tracks of the labour traitor outlining the progressive perpetration of Ethnocide against the English specificly and the British as a whole

Anonymous said...

Labour are the most disgusting traitors in history. Not just the history of Britain but in the entire history of civilisation.

And they will pay.

thelunaticarms said...

Using immigration to displace us Britons, the English especially is simply immoral.

Quick to send us over the top to die for "Queen and Country" and just as quick to discard us sfterwards.

I've said it a thousand times before, we need the Establishment gone, Red, Blue or Yellow, for since 1945 they have been undermining the rightful owners of these lands.

Ever since the common man got the vote, they have done their very best to divide us.

Our rulers are not interested in the peoples of these lands, be it native or newcomer, all they see are numbers to exploit, to play against one another, and always have a scapegoat.

And due to Equality, We're all scapegoats now.

BTW Dugg this >>> http://digg.com/d31L6Eh

marry said...

Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!
_____________________________

BA Dissertation

Anonymous said...

A good video to back up your article is this one taken in Wembley only a few months ago, Lib/Lab/Con/EUSSR will not be satisfied until every community resembles Wembley an astonishing betrayal of our ruling elite.......Donna

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N5YQUKpeyA

Anonymous said...

Google Map Roosevelt Island. Set up by Nelson died in flagrante Rockefeller, it was presented as a new utopia. Only when people moved to the manicured island did they find themselves trapped by unreliable transport, lack of services, no professional policing - jsut a gang of uniformed thugs - and that a solid building of 800 apartments had been emptied to accommodate the new arrivals - mostly NY State and City workers, 95% far left. Pity those who were not in on the plan. It was in fact a "Prisoner" type prototype to study the effects of the Frankfurt Schools 10 steps to social demoralisation and control - with a few new ones thrown in. Instead of "Utopia" it was Hell. And that Hell is now being imposed on Britain, Ireland, Australia and the rest of the world still fighting back against Rothschild imperialism.
The Rothschilds are descended from Mayer Amschel - a Khazar goldsmith and supplier of mercenaries, descendant of a Mongol tribe who infiltrated Europe by masquerading as and marrying Jews. Churchill's mother was a Rot, as are the Roosevelts and Rockefellers. They married into Astors, Walpoles, Guggenheims, Oppenheimers, Guinnesses and, inevitably 1st cousins and nieces and nephews - to keep the money in the family. This may explain why so many lose children, a tragedy for anyone.
They bankrolled Napoleon and Wellington, the Bolsheviks, and all major wars of the last three centuries, profiteering handsomely. They own the Bank of England and set the price of gold...

http://www.rense.com/general88/hist.htm (long but worth the time)

Anonymous said...

I find it worrying, depressing, and frustrating that the comments made are right.

I find it even more frustrating that there is no political solution for the abandoned white British working class.

I see that sooner rather than later the abandoned natives of Britain will seek direct action. This is a factual statement and it will come to pass.

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous 17 March

Thank you for bringing up the real enemy. Now hopefully people will start realizing that Islam is actually part of the resistance, fighting on OUR side AGAINST the Rothschilds and other Zionists. And this is why Islam has so much negative propaganda directed against it.

Islamic banking frustrates those who seek to control us through debt, and Islamic culture as a whole is opposed to the consumerist mentality that drives the need for endless economic growth that allows the banks to create more and more debt. This is what Islamophobia is REALLY about: Islam posing a threat to Zionism. All this other rubbish about Islam being uncivilized terrorists etc. is just propaganda to get us to fight each other and leave the real enemy free to continue enslaving us. They HAVE to get us to fight each other because they are too few to fight us themselves.

Muslim immigration has nothing to do with destroying 'British national identity'. We are not that important. The real agenda is the following:

1)Corrupt Muslims with Western values so that Islam is weakened.

2) Blame problems of society on them to divert attention away from Zionism.

This agenda has FAILED. Islam is gaining converts wherever Muslims have immigrated, and Muslims are helping to inform us about Zionism. This is why the Zionists are now supporting the right-wing groups to attack Muslims.

Do not be fooled! Muslims are on OUR SIDE!

http://www.radioislam.org/

IftikharA said...

Cousin marriage is common in all Muslim countries. It is in accordance with the teaching of the Holy Quran and our Prophet had married his daughter with his uncle son. There were no defects in the children. Cousin marriage is thought to generate more stable relationship. Children are born with defects whether it is cousin marriage or not. Among migrant Muslim communities the defects are due to many factors. The pressure of moving to a different cultural environment and moving from their families, problems of racism and employment are responsible for the defects during pregnancies. The defects are nothing to do with cousin marriages. The hidden agenda is that British society does not want Muslims to bring their spouses from Muslim countries. A man/woman has the right to marry anybody from anywhere. It is a question of human right and the right given to Muslims by the Holy Quran and the sayings of the Holy Prophet.

I would like to see each and every Pakistani parent should marry their sons and daughters in Pakistan so that their offsprings could speak, read and write Urdu language and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. The racist British education system has produced only notoriously monolingual Pakistani Brits. Pakistani parents would like their children to be well versed in Standard English, Arabic and Urdu languages and to be part of the British society as well as keeping in touch with their cultural roots.
Marrying cousin is and has always been legal in the UK. It is not only migrant communities who have children with their cousins, rural communities have their fair share…truly… and lets not even look at the inbreeding within royalty and the aristocracy. How else do you think the aristocracy held onto 90% of the land for so long? Muslim community is an easy target to wag the fingure at. There is no hard evidence that married to cousin causes birth defects. Before picking on Pakistanis just remember that Queen and Prince Phillip are third cousins. Glass houses…stone…. I do not think fingers should be pointed at Pakistani culture; it is another witch hunt against Muslim community. Native English people marry their cousins as well and have done for centuries. British society is ignorant regarding UK law. Henry V111 changed the law so he could marry his cousin. And it still remains legal to marry your cousin in UK today. In Britain, every Pakistani is not a Muslim and neither do they all get married to their cousins. I am sick of British media and politicians like Baroness Ruth Deech and Keighly MP Ann Cryer bashing Muslim communities every day. The hatred towards Muslim communities has grown to a level that defies all logic and even affront to British values. The problem is that Britain has never made communities feel part of British identity and people lives “parallel lives”. Faith schools are part and parcel of British education system but Muslim schools are being discouraged and regarded as “Osama bib Laden Academies.
Iftikhar Ahmad
http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

Dissertation Writing service said...

This kind of information is very limited on internet. Nice to find the post related to my searching criteria. Your updated and informative post will be appreciated by blog loving people.

Dissertation Conclusion

julie said...

The post about this topic Labour has deliberately destroyed British National identity was really pretty good. In this post about cultural enrichment and hidden criteria are discussed in detail. This was very great. Thanks for sharing.


democracy

nancy said...

Thanks for a wonderful share. Your article has proved your hard work and experience you have got in this field. Brilliant .i love it reading.


work

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
gsw said...

Never having voted labour, and also failing completely to feel even the slightest bit guilty about a colonialist policy abandoned before my birth (India/Pakistan - self rule 1953!), I am totally unable to understand why the British continued to vote for the labour party when they behaved so irresponsibly.

Agreed, there is not much choice between the parties - but surely there are some independents one could take to one side and say: if you are for us mate, we will be for you.

gsw said...

@IftikharA "Marrying cousin is and has always been legal in the UK"

It was never necessary to make it illegal. Mainly because, for most English people, it was taboo for genetic reasons. While it did happen occasionally, it was generally accepted that it should not extend more than one generation.

Intermarriage of first cousins beyond the first generation, or indeed as practised by muslims in the UK, promotes an ever shrinking gene-pool and increases the chances of reinforcement of a harmful recessive, to about the same level as brother/sister procreation.
No-one blames Mohammed for not understanding this, no doubt it does not apply to camel-breeding, however, it is extremely harmful to humans. Denying this will not help breed healthy, intelligent children.

Anonymous said...

“Deconstructing the majority” of the Norwegian population, “thus it will never again become a majority” (Professor Thomas Hylland-Eriksen)

In 2014, Norway will celebrate the 200th anniversary of its constitution, Grunnloven. Up to this celebration it has been found necessary to do some research as to what shall be The New Norway’s national feelings, and approx USD 740 000,- of taxpayers money, will be spent on this project, managed by professor Knut Kjeldstadli at the Oslo State University.

What do the – old – Norwegians think of this overall project? What are their feelings about being deconstructed as a people and a nation?

Anonymous said...

What can you say about the foreign minister and the vice prime minister of Turkey attending the funeral of a Ut√łya victim in Norway?

They were conveying condolences from "70 million Turks, and the prime minister".

It took place at the Kolstad football stadium, the most multicultural one, accordint to local paper, in Trondheim, where also the the Norwegian Minister of Trade and Industry, Trond Giske, attended.

This brings to mind the sultan visiting Turkish colonies in Germany, and in the Turkish language, telling the Turks to stay Turkish and not assimilate into the German society.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,748070,00.html

Anonymous said...

Jostein Gaarder &
Thomas Hylland-Eriksen

"The global Islamophobic blogosphere consists of loosely connected networks of people — including students, civil servants, capitalists, and neo-Nazis."

"Others have arrived as refugees and asylum-seekers from countries like Somalia, Iraq and Bosnia. And a substantial number have come to Norway to join relatives or spouses already in the country. About 200,000 — including more than 30,000 Pakistanis — have roots in Muslim countries."

- "More than 30 000" Pakistanis, is that a number to be trusted? We know that the left are redefining Pakistanis to reappear as "Norwegians" in the statistics if this suits the purpose of the occasion, as part of deconstructing the majority of the Norwegian people.

"Jostein Gaarder is the author of “Sophie’s World” and many other books. Thomas Hylland Eriksen is a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo."
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/29/opinion/Gaarder-Eriksen.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=gaarder&st=cse

Anonymous said...

PM attending funeral. PM wife veiled for the occasion. New norway.

http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/oslobomben/artikkel.php?artid=10089134


Crombouke

Sorry, if you'd rather not have this info on this post, but after all, it's the umma. UK, or Norway, what's the difference?

Actually, UK and Norway have a common history from way back. The countries and the people have been very close also in modern times.

Until recently, when the respective leaders of both countries decided to destroy these two national identities by the same means.

Harish Kumar said...

The fundamental problem is the Marxist ideology which believes that Revolution is necessary for the Ideal Utopian Communist society to come into existence. If tomorrow people are willing to vote to power a party which promises nationalisation of all resources and abolition of private property, and giving everything to the people on the basis of "each according to his need, rather than capacity", the Marxist would oppose that party as a Capitalist Stooge (or Lackey).

Marxists believe that revolution is the only way.

And since today's workers are not interested in revolting thanks to the welfare states that the capitalist countries have become, they plan to use Islam and muslims (useful idiots) to get rid of the capitalists. Since Nation is also a capitalist construct to deceive the massess, destruction of national identity is a top priority for leftists everywhere.

The leftists sincerely believe that once muslims destroy the British nation and state, automatically capitalism will vanish and communism will be established....the capitalist state would just "wither away". And since religion itself was created by the capitalists to control the masses (religion being the opium to sedate and hypnotise the working class), they believe that once muslims destroy capitalist Britain, Islam itself will "wither away", muslims will automatically give up Islam and become atheists, after they have taken over the British society and the British people.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 17 May. " Thank you for bringing up the enemy.Now hopefully people will start realizing that islam is actually part of the resistance,fighting on OUR side AGAINST the Rothschild's and other Zionists..." Who are you kidding? muslims are the problem not matter where ever they are in the Western World.
" Do not be fooled muslims are on OUR SIDE " If they are? Then why are muslims NOT fighting on OUR SIDE in Afghanistan and Iraq? You are writing under pseudo name, and we are not fooled by you muslims. Have you heard of " al-Taqiyya"? = when muslims lie to non believers. now see www.thereligionofpeace.com and www.creepingsharia.wordpress.com ssk

business phone broadband said...

This is absolutely awesome! Great work!
business phone broadband

business phone providers said...

I Like your site,iam sharing my friends excellent work.
http://www.xinix.co.uk/cheap-business-calls-deals-installation-phone-line-packages/

cheap jerseys free shipping said...

In view of good track Labour traitor overview progress of ethnic cultural genocide do bad things to English specific and Britain as a whole