Friday, 22 January 2010

Twelve Tactics of Taqiyya - lying and deception for the benefit of Islam



Most religions respect the truth and forbid lying. However Islam is different.

Allah is 'the best of deceivers' (Koran 3.54), and since the highest goal of Islamic ethics is to spread Islam by any means whatsoever, it is hardly surprising that lying and deceit should be quite acceptable if carried out for the benefit of Islam.

"War is Deceit", said Muhammad, and Islam is always at war with the infidel until Islam dominates.

This 'Holy Lying' is known as taqiyya (sometimes spelled taqiya or taquiya) - This may take many forms, including outright lies, feigned moderation, and condemnation of terrorist attacks to the Infidel while rejoicing with fellow Muslims.

Here are some of the ploys, arguments, logical fallacies and diversionary tactics used by taqiyya tacticians:


"Islam is the Religion of Peace!"

[1] Taqiyya about taqiyya.
Of course taqiyya won't work once the infidels realise they're being duped, so Muslims deny that taqiyya exists, or that it is used to deceive infidels. 'There is no such thing as Taqiya' or 'Taqiyya is something I never heard of and I had to go and look it up' or "Taqiyya is only practised by Sunnis/Shi'ites, we Shi'ites/Sunnis always tell the truth". See here and here for refutations. Also Denying the Denial: Taqiyya About Taqiyya; Lying About Lying

[2] Playing the race card and guilt by association.
An accusation of racism is such a trump card that Jihadists will play it whenever they can. Despite Islam not being a race, any criticism of Islam immediately gets the knee-jerk retaliation of 'racism'.
For example; 'You are expressing the same views about Islam as racists, therefore you are a racist.' This is similar logic to to 'Communists believe two and two make four. You believe two and two make four. Therefore you are a Communist'.



Godwin's Law

[3] Godwin's Law
- a special (and inevitable) version of guilt by association with racism used in online discussions, whereby the first person to invoke Hitler or the Nazis wins the argument. The 'logic' is something like:

CRITICISM OF ISLAM = RACISM = NAZISM

Therefore, if you criticise Islam you are a Nazi.


[4] Circular reasoning
'The Koran says it is the word of God. So whatever it says must be true. Therefore it is true that the Koran is the word of God because it says so'


[5] The infidels' quotes from the Koran are always taken out of context.
For example 'Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them' is taken out of context, and really means 'Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them setting fire to your house' - or something similar.


[6] Infidels can't understand the original Arabic of the Koran.
So 'Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them' is actually a Medieval Arabic expression meaning 'Help old ladies across busy streets and remember to feed the birds in winter'.

CAIR spokesperson

[7] Tu Quoque (you also).
'We blow people up/ behead them but you do the same,' - Normally used in attempts to refute arguments that Islam is intrinsically violent. Often refers back to the Crusades, Inquisition etc. Also 'There are equally nasty bits in the Bible'. Yes, there are violent episodes in the Bible, but the Bible is descriptive of battles and massacres long ago, whereas the Koran is prescriptive of battles and massacres yet to come.

[8] 'Abrahamic/monotheistic faith' false kin argument.
This scam usually take the form of 'Islam is just a further development of Christianity, a brother Abrahamic/ monotheist faith.'
Of course it isn't! Islam is a travesty and perversion of Christianity in many respects, and Jesus would probably have advised the pedophile Mohammed to tie a millstone round his neck and jump into the sea. (Mark 9:42). In Islam stoning of women is still a major spectator sport, whereas Jesus forbade it (John 8:7). Human sacrifice is an abomination in Judaism and Christianity, but is encouraged in Islam.

Another Satanic aspect of Islam is that it deliberately destroys the conscience of its followers.

More on the 'Abrahamic Faiths' contrick

[9] Quoting abrogated verses from the Koran in order to appear moderate.
A favorite one is 'Let there be no compulsion in religion'. This verse and many like it are actually null and void and disregarded by all Muslims (though not by gullible infidels). They are peaceful Meccan verses which are completely cancelled by later and much more violent Medinan verses.

[10] 'You owe us a debt of gratitude because Islam is the basis of Western civilisation'.
This sort of statement is usually backed up by revisionist arguments that Muslims invented everything and were responsible for the Renaissance (Sheikh Speare was a Muslim playwright etc).

In some ways this is a rather pathetic quest for significance. Muslim culture has been moribund for the past 600 years, whereas the West has forged ahead. Muslims now want a stake in the success story by claiming they were somehow responsible for the West's development.

[11] 'A third of the world's population believe in Islam, so it deserves respect.'
- But not so long ago a third of the world's population believed the earth was flat. Numbers don't mean anything, especially when the Islamic population is the most backward and illiterate on earth. Muslims are very keen on 'respect', but someone should tell them that respect needs to be earned.

[12] 'We are victims of Islamophobia'.
Muslims are always playing the victim, if not of racism then of the even more heinous thought-crime of ISLAMOPHOBIA. Of course there is no such thing as Islamophobia, since a phobia is an irrational fear, whereas fear of Islam as a clear and present danger is a totally rational reaction from any infidel.


...and, let's make it a baker's dozen...


[13] Sufis are non-violent
This is an example of the Good Cop/Bad Cop routine. Sufis portray themselves as being a kind of Buddhist version of Islam: peaceful, mystical and generally fluffy and New Age. Well-meaning Westerners are attracted by Sufis in the hope that they have finally found examples of the elusive Moderate Muslims.

Unfortunately, this is clutching at straws. Sufis are just as violent and supremacist as the rest of them. See links under Sufis at Everything you need to know about Islam.

A particularly good example of the Sufi Good Cop/Bad Cop contrick was the Ground Zero Victory Mosque, where the 'peaceful' Sufis deceived the more gullible New Yorkers until they were exposed as normal Muslims.


-------------------------------------------------------------

Moral Equivalence as Self-administered Taqiyya
Those infidels who use the 'moral equivalence argument' to compare Islam with other religions need to examine their own subconscious psychological motives. They are not only attempting to delude others, but are in deep denial and trying to delude themselves. They are administering self-generated taqiyya as a tranquilizer to blot out reality.

The conscious part of the moral equivalence argument takes the form "Christians and Jews have committed atrocities such as the McVeigh, Breivik and King David Hotel bombings, so Christianity and Judaism are just the same as Islam. Therefore Islam poses no special threat."

The fallacies are obvious: Christian and Jewish acts of terrorism are rare and infrequent; they are rejected by the majority of followers of the religions, go against the core teachings of the religions, and are committed by a few isolated loonies. In contrast, Islamic acts of terrorism are commonplace, are encouraged by the Koran and are supported, if not actually carried out, by a substantial proportion of Muslims.

The unconscious and self-deluding part of the moral equivalence argument is the refusal to face the fact that Islam is an intrisically violent totalitarian ideology that has infiltrated our civilization, and is bent on our conversion, subjugation or elimination. To acknowlege this would be deeply disturbing and well outside the comfort zone of most people (remember the popular enthusiasm for appeasement of Hitler and 'Peace in Our Time'?) . So we reassure ourselves, by the moral equivalence argument, that Islam is just like other religions.

It's far easier to stay in denial and regard Islam as being no more a threat to our lives and culture than the Quakers or Lubavitcher Hasidim. That way we don't have to worry about the looming global clash of civizations, or think about the unpleasant courses of action that may be necessary to reduce the threat.

Moral equivalence is moral cowardice.


-------------------------------------------------------------

Don't Mention the Jihad!

"One dominant theme during Ramadan in the Arab world is the discussion, in the media and in religious circles, of the commandment of jihad and the obligation therein to wage war against the infidels. It then focuses on two recent op-eds, written by Arab-Muslims, that discuss the need to tone down Muslim talk of offensive jihad.

One writer, Khaled Al-Ghanami, states that the “wiser” supporters of offensive jihad believe that Muslims “must sit and wait until the era of our strength returns.” In the meantime, according to these Muslims, “there is nothing shameful about taqiyya [deception] until the time is ripe.” Al-Ghanami bemoans the fact that such Muslims operate naively “on the assumption that the world doesn’t read, doesn’t monitor … and is not paying attention to the calls for killing, tyranny, and aggression that we are spreading.”

Similarly, Abdallah Al-Naggar writes: “Today, the Muslims’ circumstances are different [i.e., they are weak], and talk of this aspect [of jihad] requires a smart approach, one that stresses the aspect of self defense, instead of aggression and onslaught,” since discussing offensive jihad “arouses the enmity of people”; thus, “there is a need for wisdom [i.e., kitman] in our impassioned discussions of war and battles.”

These writers are insightful enough to understand that Islam’s imperative for Muslims to wage offensive jihad is the one insurmountable obstacle for peace between Muslims and non-Muslims. Best not to keep reminding the infidel world, then. More at http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/offensive-jihad-the-one-incontrovertible-problem-with-islam/?singlepage=true

The bottom line message is


Don't trust them and don't believe a word they say!


Further references to Taqiyya:

Al-Taqiya - the Muslim method of conquest

Al-Taqiyya

Taqiyya - Religious deception

Understanding Taqiyya - Islamic Principle of Lying for the Sake of Allah

What is Taqiyya?

It's called taqiyya - lying for Allah

Taqiyya - Islam's doctrine of deception

Daily Gleaner - Victim of Taqiyya


"It's just a tiny minority of extremists"








Everything you need to know about Islam (guaranteed free of Taqiyya)

...

32 comments:

Jeff said...

Al Taqiyya

Robin Shadowes said...

It is scary how they are trying to rewrite history in their favour. In my country there are muslims who claim the vikings where muslims. It's a way for them to legitimize the taking of our country and culture. Over time they will erase and destroy everything contrary to their claims. Any evidence that kufr was the original natives will be impossible to prove.

bernie Planck's Constant said...

Great run-down.

Just FYI, I linked to your article from http://bit.ly/bVvU8c

Anonymous said...

Thank you so much for this informative blog. I am just starting to read about "Islamization" and it is indeed terrifying. We need to be informed and kick the pc crap out the back door.

Anonymous said...

All this is to much for me?I don not understand this world any more?What is going on?Who is trying to rule the world?Certainly I am not????

Good luck in solving this problem before it is to late.

Anonymous said...

STOP PRESS!!!

ISLAM IS PEACE! IN SPITE OF 15,000 DEADLY JIHAD ATTACKS SINCE 9-11!!! THE JIHADISTS ARE PEACE-FIGHTERS!!!

HUH???

That's right!

Tens of thousands of jihadists have all MISUNDERSTAND ISLAM!!!

Well, why don't those mad mullahs explain that violent jihad attacks, rape jihad, legal jihad, suppression of free speech, suicide bombing children's buses is a MISUNDERSTANDING of Islamofascism?

Oh well.

What a bunch of shameless morons.

Anonymous said...

In a primitive desert culture the 'honor' of the tribe is more important than truth or the individual.

Suppression of anyone is necessary if the collective identity (narcissism) is to survive.

Islam is collective malignant narcissism.

pumabydesign001 said...

Extremely informative. Since Muslims are hell bent on the islamization of America, we must be prepared and in order to be prepared, we must know our enemy and that which he is capable of.

Will post on both of my blogs linking to you. Thanks for sharing.

foxmuldar said...

President Imam Obama meets many of the requirements of Taqiyya. Obama claims Muslims have done great things for America. He trecks off to the Middle East and kowtows to Muslims while at the same time apologizing for what he sees as America's faults. Giving his approval for the Ground Zero Mosque after having his Muslim friends over to the White Mosque to celebrate Ramadan was another way of showing his adoration for Islam and hatred for America.

Thanks for the explanation of Taqiyya, Were seeing it out in the open now that the debate over the ground zero mosque is in focus.

Omar Al Barghouthi said...

I would recommend you reading this blog (http://irrelevantcombinations.blogspot.com/2010/08/haters-sheep-and-ground-zero-mosque.html) being part of these global-multicultural and diverse cosmopolitan societies all over the world; would require each one of us to take the following steps before judging any topic:
1- Step out of your thoughts and beliefs.
2- Understand and define what your objectives are
3- Look with a naked eye not having an influence affecting your way of studying that topic
4- look around and search multiple sources
5- ask people from both opposing point of views and listen to them and try to understand objectively

IT is just sad how millions of Christians , Muslims, Jews, Atheists are judging each other without even having a basic fundamental clue of what is going on.

LaurAyn said...

Well written and explained post. I've posted it on twitter. Thanks for coming by my blog.

wallyUK said...

I've found that Muslim apologists often misrepresent by omission. My favourite was on one website where it stated that the first country in Europe to give all adult women the vote was a Muslim country, so Islam is at the forefront of female emancipation: they were right - it was Turkey - Ataturk was also banning the veil,banishing the Arabic alphabet, making men shave off their beards and excluding devout Muslims from commissions in the army at the same time. He was seeking to de-Islamise Turkey.
They also like to use words which mean one thing to infidels and another to believers e.g. peace (what happens when sharia dominates everywhere); innocent (to particularly devout Muslims, not believing Allah's messenger is the worst crime anyone can commit);Zionist (synonym for Jew); peace treaty (a temporary respite for Muslims to re-group and build up their forces)etc etc

Cialis Online said...

Islamic traditions are so bizarre and weird, they even kill for what they believe.

Anonymous said...

Here's number 14

"It is permissible to use [innovations] to deceive the disbelievers in dar al-harb"

Bid'a is innovation in Islamic doctrine or practice. It is considered a serious sin, since Islamic doctrine and practice is supposed to have been set entirely by Allah through Muhammad. This idea tends to discourage Islamic reform, including reform of the aspects of Islamic doctrine that call for warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers. But this explanation of bid'a (bida't in Turkish) from Serenity Fountain, a Turkish Sunni site, allows for the appearance of innovation, so as to deceive unbelievers. (I don't know if this piece is online; I received it in a Serenity Fountain email blast.)

This is noteworthy because here again, an Islamic authority is saying what non-Muslims are charged with "Islamophobia" for saying: a Muslim can pretend to innovate in religion, appearing to stand for reform of the unpleasant or supremacist aspects of Islam, in order to fool credulous kuffar. On ABC's "This Week" last Sunday, Ground Zero mosque spokeswoman Daisy Khan reacted with offended incredulity when 9/11 family member Peter Gadiel suggested that he wasn't sure he could trust her soothing words of moderation -- yet on the same show, "journalist" Christiane Amanpour would not allow me or others to give solid proof that Khan was lying, having denied on the show that the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero would be a mosque at all, after having affirmed that it would be at a lower Manhattan Community Board meeting.

So was Daisy Khan deceiving unbelievers in the dar al-harb? Why is it illegitimate, in light of teaching like this, even to ask that question?

SERENITY FOUNTAIN (HUZUR PINARI) www.serenityfountain.org

For your questions about Islamic knowledge:
serenity.fountain@gmail.com

06 October 2010 / 28 Shawwal 1431

KINDS OF BID'AT

There are three kinds of bid'at [1]:

1-It is the worst bid'at to use -without any darurat (compulsion)-- those things which the Shari'at [2] says to be the signs of disbelief. On page 467 of al-Bariqa and 696 of Majma al-anhur, it is written that the 'ulama said, "It is permissible to use them to deceive (khud'a) the disbelievers in dar al-harb. "

2-Those beliefs which disagree with what is communicated by the savants of the Ahl as-sunnat [3] are also evil bid'ats.

3-Those reforms made in the name of worship are bid'ats in worship and are grave sins. Some ulama divided the bid'ats in ibadat or amal (deed) into the hasana and sayyia. Al-Imam ar-Rabbani 'rahmatullahi alaih' did not say bid'ats about those bid'ats which scholars termed 'hasana'. He called them 'sunnat-i-hasana'. He said 'bid'ats' about those which they termed 'bid'at-i-sayyia', and he condemned such bid'ats. Wahhabis, on the other hand, say 'sayyia' about bid'ats termed 'hasana' and approved, and they call those who practice such bid'ats 'disbelievers', 'polytheists'.
GLOSSARY
[1] bid'at: (pl. bida') heresy; false, disliked belief or practice that did not exist in the four sources of Islam but which has been introduced later as an Islamic belief or 'ibada in expectation of thawab (blessings) ; heresy.
[2] Shari'at: (pl. of Shari'a) i) rules and commandments as a whole of the religion. ii) religion.
[3] Ahl as-Sunna (wa'l-Jama'a): the true pious Muslims who follow as-Sahabat al-kiram. These are called Sunni Muslims. A Sunni Muslim adapts himself to one of the four Madhhabs. These madhhabs are Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali.




http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/10/it-is-permissible-to-use-innovations-to-deceive-the-disbelievers-in-dar-al-harb.html

Peter Clemerson said...

TO WallyUK

The web site you refer to deceives its readers to a greater extent than you appreciated. The following is from http://www.enjoyturkey.com/info/culture/Woman.htm

"Women in Turkey obtained the right to vote and be elected in municipal elections in 1930 and in parliamentary elections in 1934. Prior to that date, the number of countries where women had the right to vote and be elected as members of parliament was 28 and the number of countries where women actually were elected as members of parliament was 17."

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage you will find the following:
In 1906, Finland was the first nation in the world to give full suffrage (the right to vote and to run for office) to all citizens, including women. New Zealand was the first country in the world to grant all citizens the right to vote, in 1893, but women did not get the right to run for the New Zealand legislature until 1919.

Given that the web site referred to Europe only, Finland wins by 28 years.

The web site provides just one more lie among millions.

Mary Esterhammer-Fic said...

My FAVORITE example of Muslim accomplishments was when I "learned", years ago, that the Seminole Indians were ORIGINALLY (pre-Columbus) Muslims! That's right! You can tell from the Seminole word "Tallahassee", which clearly contains "Allah." Maybe that's why so many of the 9/11 hijackers had Florida addresses.

Anonymous said...

Most of their claims about 'contributions' to science , mathematics, mettalurgy is copied from
india and some from china and was sold to europeans as islamic inventions and discoveries
A typical Al taqiyya to fool the dhimmis in europe.

Anonymous said...

REALITY CHECK:

Are Muslims the ONLY people who might be lying? Might the West have an agenda that is served by portraying Muslims in a negative light?

WHO BENEFITS from Islamophobia?

Think about this, and just maybe you Islamophobes will come to your senses. And once you do, it will become so obvious what is going on that you will be amazed how you couldn't see it before.

goethechosemercy said...

Quote:
3- Look with a naked eye not having an influence affecting your way of studying that topic
end quote.

This is a tenet of multiculturalism.
It is impossible to look at anything, to study anything, without bringing your own perspective to it.
I am a Westerner.
Don't ask me not to be one when I study.
I mean it.

goethechosemercy said...

Quote:Are Muslims the ONLY people who might be lying? Might the West have an agenda that is served by portraying Muslims in a negative light?

WHO BENEFITS from Islamophobia?
end quote.

The West does indeed have an agenda.
The preservation of its culture and history.
The continued free speech of those who criticize Islam.
The preservation of Judaism, Christianity and all other religions.
The preservation of the lives and sexual integrity of the apostate, the woman, the child.
The preservation of private property-- particularly as owned by non-Muslims.

goethechosemercy said...

Quote:
Think about this, and just maybe you Islamophobes will come to your senses.
end quote.

We have seen the desperate attempt you have made to have the last word.
The desperate attempt you have made to dominate the discussion and discredit our thoughts.
You are not very democratic. No.
Not very democratic at all.

Anonymous said...

"The West does indeed have an agenda."

So you've admitted this much. Now, is the West above lying when it comes to serving its agenda? If not, then the assertion that Muslims lie (as if Muslims were the ONLY GROUP capable of lying) is impotent. The West has at least as much incentive to lie about itself, about its agenda, and about Islam as vice versa. Hereafter it is a general matter of sorting out the lies from the truth, on all sides.

Anonymous said...

Hi,
I am from germany. We have people here from all over the world and from all religions. But we have extreme problems with people from one special group - independent of the region they come or once came from(!). So guess which group I mean. They are by far the most violent and aggressive people here and at the same time they cry the loudest how badly we treat them (of course we are "the nazis and racists" - we are germans) and they demand more than all other people etc.. Anyone else would just call this shameless, but if you know a bit about Islam then you know that the correct word for it is "taqiyya".

I also believed in their crying for decades, but then I started to read their "holy book" and about Islam's history, and I started to understand all this "strange" behavior.

If anybody doesn't believe this her and is to lazy to inform and read this nice book etc.: Ask an ex-muslim or some non-muslim from an islamic country.

P.S.: Look around in the world and in history: Everywhere it is and always was the same.

Anonymous said...

"we have extreme problems with people from one special group - independent of the region they come or once came from(!). So guess which group I mean."

Jews?

This is one reason why I am thankful to Muslims: they understand Zionism and are trying to help us see the truth about it. Which is why all you people hating on Islam are nothing but Zionist attack dogs.

It's funny you mention the Nazis, because Hitler was very much pro-Islam, seeing Muslims as an ally against Zionism. Do your own research.

Mahound said...

Islamic clerics in Malaysia and Indonesia are constantly pressuring the secular politicians to deny human rights for the non-muslims minorities ( Buddhists, Hindus, Christians,etc).
Read this ood website http://www.reocities.com/freethoughtmecca/islam.html

Anonymous said...

you all need chill out guys! get a life or summat. Read a book!

Anonymous said...

what - chill out with scary genicidal murderers on the loose?

I can not tell which Muslim is not a terrorist and which Muslim is.

thoughtcriminal51 said...

And always remember to attach "phobe" to end of word to make opponents appear mentally unbalanced....
Islamaphobe.
BEHOLD a new disease!

Anonymous said...

thoughtcriminal,

So true. In this light, I am convinced that Muslims suffer from "Kafirphobia" (fear of non Muslim and non Islamic culture).

Anonymous said...

When our founding fathers built made the Constitution, they gave us freedom. This is America and we have Freedom of Religon. And Islam is a Religon, is it not? I am a Muslim, born and raised in America yet I go to a private Catholic school. I am forced to attend and ace a religon that is not my own. Yet,how many of you can say you have ever attened an Islamic class?
I not only know my religon but Christianity as well. And here,you all make assumptions about my religon. Have you read and fully understood the Quran? Have you read word for word or have you only chosen the parts that were in your benefit? And you call Muslims stupid? Being stupid has nothing to do with your race or your religon. That is common knowledge. I suppose every idiot working at Sheetz or McDonald's is a Muslim,right? Any person with a right mind would know that,but here this website has many people believing that Muslims are stupid. And you say we are always playing the victim,but here you are blaming every inncoent Muslim for 9/11. Like Osama Bin Laden called our houses to tell us what was going on. The many Muslim doctors there are,are they terroists? Terrorism is not a religon,it is a crime. A crime that has forever judged every single Muslim unfairly.Yes,there are cold blooded people out there,yet not every one of them is a Muslim. You have been blinded with your own hate to see the truth. How do you think I felt when I saw this website. Trash-talking my religon as if we were worthless. How would you feel if you found a website about your religon like this one? Muslims are people. We think,we laugh,we cry, we eat,we sleep just like anyone out there. But you are just to ignorant to see it. Islam is a religon of people,many different people. Not every Muslim is like the other.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous, stop whining about your hurt feelings. Take responsibility for your foolish decision to join what plain facts of history have shown to be a murderous, bloody, and hateful false religion of political control. You'll convert no one here. Go try to squeeze some truth out of your "holy book".

Anonymous said...

I am sorry for the discomfort you feel upon being confronted with what probably seems too you to be an incessant barrage of negativity concerning your choice of ideology. But, just as I have had to take an objective appraisal of the historical travesties and current inconsistancies that are all too much a part of Christianity and find my own way to real truth and a viable, personal relationship with a real and loving God, you must also find your own way to a place where you can weigh the real evidence available at sites such as this, which have presented objective evidences, well documented and footnoted, of the travesties and inconsistancies abounding in Islam and its adherents. To align oneself with an ideology that at whose core, i.e.- its scripture and the personal life of its prophet and its most prominent clergy, is found evil rationalized and even encouraged, others can only assume that your motivations for following such an ideology must involve something other than a longing for truth or love or righteousness. Unresolved needs for acceptance due to abandonment, authority issues, anger at established culture due to perceived exclusion, all of which are real issues needful of spiritual resolution but none of which should be attractive attributes or be offered paths to act out on in any religion.