Friday, 22 January 2010


Violent, deceitful, plundering pedophile

Viewed rationally, Islam is a non-starter. Its 'Holy' Book consists of half-digested fragments of Judeo-Christian theology, mixed with the bile of hatred, and spewed into the fair face of Christendom from the putrefying guts of a violent, deceitful, plundering pedophile. The Koran is full of historical, scientific and logical errors and even contradicts itself on numerous occasions. Not exactly the work of a Supreme Intellect!

And yet Muslims claim that these demented ramblings and rantings are the literal word of God Almighty, to be treated with utmost respect. They throw enormous tantrums when Korans are left in toilets or returned to libraries with bacon-rashers as bookmarks. In the Islamic paradise of Pakistan, damaging a Koran or insulting The Pedophile are punishable by death.

To understand Islam we need to look at the most primitive organisational state of mankind - Tribalism.

If we regard the Ummah as a tribe, and the Koran, the Pedophile and the Black Meteorite as the tribe's three main totems, we begin to get a better understanding of Islam. A tribe derives its identity and unity by displays of reverence towards supernatural totems, and feels insecure and threatened whenever the power of its totems is weakened, for example by the totems being 'humiliated' or 'polluted' . One of the surest ways of demoralising a tribe has always been to desecrate its totems.

This explains the rage at the Motoons, and the 'hate crime' of the Koran down the toilet. It also explains why the Saudi authorities made such a fuss when they found a Christian in Mecca. The precincts of the Holy Meteorite had been defiled by a najis kaffir.

Tribal culture and psychology are difficult for civilised people to understand. Most parts of Western Europe have not been organised tribally since the Dark Ages, so it's difficult to get inside Muslim mind and understand just how primitive and benighted are the psychological processes that go on there. For example:

- A tribe regards itself as perpetually at war with all other tribes - hence the Muslim worldview of Dar a-Harb in conflict with Dar al-Islam, and Ummah in conflict with Kaffir.

- The property and women of other tribes are there for the taking. Might is right - hence the Jizya, Razzia, white slaving etc which are all justified by the Koran. Tribalism also explains the chants of 'We will take your wives for booty' at the London Motoons demonstration - this is the typical behavior of the stone age savage.

- The ethics of reciprocity (do as you would be done by) only apply within the tribe. Hence the lack of any Golden Rule in Islam. The nearest you get to the Golden Rule in the Koran is desiring for your brother Muslim ('kin-selection') what you desire for yourself - in other words share out the booty equally.

- Loyalty to the tribe is of paramount importance - hence the punishment by death for apostates.

- The tribe must not mingle with other tribes or else it may lose its identity - hence the self-imposed ghettoisation and ethnic cleansing of Kaffirs from the periphery of the ghetto as seen in European cities.

- There is a great desire to destroy or humiliate the totems of other tribes, especially where they have phallic significance - hence the attack on the twin towers, and the plans for the MegaMosque whose minarets will be taller than any Christian building.

Muslims in the modern world are living fossils, though like dinosaurs suddenly set down on the streets of London, none the less dangerous for being so primitive. Islam appeals to the lowest and basest instincts of man, and in the absence of a strong, confident modern culture will gradually reduce its host society to a dysfunctional state of anarchy where Islam can gain the upper hand.

Tribalism makes it impossible to defeat Islam by reason or appeals to decency. The Koran, the Pedophile and the Meteorite are not capable of being examined rationally or ethically - they are pre-rational symbols of tribal cohesion. And when that tribe is on a roll , and believes itself to be the strongest and fastest growing tribe winning the Jihad against all the rest, no rational argument will persuade its warriors to abandon the winning side.

In addition, the snowball effect of Islam's continuing success attracts converts, who also want to be on the winning side, and demoralises Islam's Judeo-Christian opponents, leading to defeatism and appeasement. As Osama bin Laden said, if people have to choose between going with the strong horse or the weak horse, they will choose the strong horse.

Predatory cult
The difference between predatory cults such as Islam and real religions, is that a true religion attempts to bring out the best in people, whereas a predatory cult does the opposite.

Muslims inhabit a different moral universe from the rest of us, where good is evil and evil is good, if it serves the purposes of Islam.

While other religions teach goodwill to mankind, Islam teaches hostility to all non-members of the cult.

Jesus, in the parable of the Good Samaritan, taught his followers to help all people in need, irrespective of their religion. Jews are commanded to be a light unto the nations. The Buddha taught compassion for all suffering beings.

But in Islam, charity applies only to fellow Muslims, and in fact many Islamic charities are money-launderers for jihad.

There is no Golden Rule in Islam. There is no place for conscience in Islam. Peel away the thin veneer of religiosity, and all you find is vicious, primitive, predatory tribalism.

As well as the various forms of organized premeditated jihad, Muslims are psychologically primed to be opportunist jihadists, spontaneously attacking their prey like packs of hyenas as soon as they sense they have the numerical advantage. Islam legitimizes and encourages predatory attacks on infidels.

This kind of spontaneous, opportunistic jihad is exemplified by the 'Street Jihad' attacks in Europe, and Islamic gang rapes such as that of Lara Logan.

Most religions have a restraining influence on anti-social behavior, but Islam has precisely the opposite effect due to deliberate destruction of the conscience.

Islam incites and excuses crime against infidels. Because of their arrogant sense of supremacy and automatic entitlement, Muslims regard infidels not as fellow human beings, but as walking opportunities for plunder , parasitism and rape.

Islam is not a religion. It is an international criminal conspiracy like the Mafia .

See also links under Tribalism and Ummah at
Everything you need to know about Islam


Anonymous said...


This death cult can be stopped by civilisation.

Reason and logic will defeat this absurd tribal lunacy. Holy meteorite? Nonsense.

As the Islamic world learns to read, they will be reading your website. Stay at it.

Don't underestimate the power of truth, honesty and integrity. Islam has none of those.

Civilisation is stronger than Islamic barbarism.

Anonymous said...

If civilisation were stronger than Islamic barbarism, then Islam would not exist. We have to fight fear with courage, force with strength, and violence with law. It is better to cut out a tumor when it is small, to preserve the host body. If you wait until the tumor is large, the body dies. If we close our eyes and stick our heads into the sand, we die. Islam is designed to use every tool it can fine, and promotes lying as a tool to achieve their ends. They believe lying to an infidel is good, because infidels are evil. We can NEVER believe any words of peace from a Muslim. They will always be lies.

If America does not wake up and see the truth of what Islam really is, we all die. America will cease to exist, and the evil of Islam wins.

Anonymous said...

I'm afraid, to effectively deal with savages, the civilized themselves need to engage in savagery for as long as it takes to eradicate the initial cancer.

This doesn't mean going about perpetrating mass rape, lapidation, amputation and decapitation, it means utilizing strategic planning and plotting involving the use of combinations of biological, chemical and convention weapons to achieve the necessary goal.

Anonymous said...

Very good article.

The answer you touched on is this: the West MUST accept the objective moral and practical superiority of recognizing individual rights and freedom.

We must have no guilt over that unless we fail to live up to it, or fail to defend it. There is NO moral equivalence: Western civilization is RIGHT and Islam is WRONG.

Allah will submit to the Constitution.

Here's a way to help make it happen:

BURN THE KORAN FOR FREEDOM and upload the video for all the world to see. Defy the terrorists and their appeasers. Let it endanger the military! Let it remind them that defeating danger from our enemies is their job. Force our generals and politicians to defend our rights against the enemy, not to defend the enemy against our rights. Control this war from your backyard today, and join the Independence Day Crusade on July 4th 2011. Let's roll.

Anonymous said...

Good insight into Muslim tribal honor/shame psychology:

Traeh said...

Some neat points in this article -- for example the idea that Muhammad, the meteorite, and the Koran function as totems, as pre-rational bases of tribal cohesion.

Are there limits to trencherbone's characterizations of tribes?

But I wonder if trencherbone mischaracterized some aspects of tribalism. Tribes do sometimes mingle and intermarry. Not all tribes are aggressive against other tribes. Not all tribes only practice the Golden Rule among themselves, while treating members of other tribes as mere objects of war. It would be useful to know if all these things are in fact predominating characteristics of most tribes. Is that what Trencherbone affirms?

It's certainly an interesting line of thought, Islam as tribalism.

Still, if Islam as tribe is only a metaphor, the metaphor, like all metaphors, necessarily breaks down at certain points. So at what points does the metaphor break down? Metaphor or analogy is most educational where one unfolds both similarities and differences between the two things analogized.

Primitive tribes and the Golden Rule

It's interesting that certain tribes and primitive groups name themselves "human beings." Inuit (what the Eskimos call themselves) means "human being" or "people" or the like. Those outside the tribe, at least before modernization, were apparently not considered to be human beings or people, at least not to the same extent. Ancient Egypt is another example of this. Apparently only Egyptians were considered to be "people." In some Egyptian literature written during a period of breakdown and weak dynasties, one Egyptian nobleman complained about the influx of foreigners to Egypt, and lamented that "foreigners are becoming people everywhere."

If primitive groups do frequently reserve "people" and "human" for their own tribe, that does suggest the golden rule would be applied primarily or exclusively among the tribe. And it's not surprising, since primitive tribes, at least, often or always believe themselves to be at the center of the earth and the universe. That was true of ancient Egypt. And I gather that it was true of tribes based on totems.

Is Islam really pre-rational? Or is it a case of stillborn rationalism?

I don't know that Islam can rightly be called pre-rational. If it is, it's a pre-rational state of mind that has learned to maintain itself in the midst of a modernizing and rationalizing context. If you look at Islamic law, it's extremely rational and logical, within certain limits. The assumptions of Islamic law are not justified rationally, of course, and that's a problem mostly where it involves the subjugation and murder of non-Muslims. But mathematics, a highly rational endeavor if ever there was one, also starts from assumptions that are not and cannot be justified. (See Godel, among others.) The analogy between math and Islam breaks down at important points, of course. Mathematicians, unlike Muslim scholars, can and do freely reflect on their basic assumptions, even if, in the end, those assumptions must simply be accepted and cannot themselves be justified mathematically. Certain assumptions are simply necessary in order to proceed with mathematical work. By contrast, Islam not only starts from certain unjustified assumptions -- which it claims are experiences or facts -- but Islam also forbids free rational thought about those assumptions, "facts" and "experiences". In that sense, Islam is anti-rational. Is that anti-rationalism based on some pre-rational condition of Islam? Perhaps Islam is not pre-rationalism, but stillborn rationalism.

Anonymous said...

What a load of hogwash. Islam invites everyone to be a Muslim. A group with open membership is, by definition, not a tribe.

Islam is in fact one of the most universal ideas there is. Muhammad explicitly stated that everyone - even animals - are born as Muslims, and that conversion to Islam (hence often known as REVERSION) is simply a re-confirmation of our common original condition.

Anonymous said...

Such anti-social ideology will never be lack of ignorant and cynical followers.

Anonymous said...

Terror prevails! That's the secret and most powerful weapon for Islam.

sheik yer'mami said...

Anon claims:

"This death cult can be stopped by civilisation.

Reason and logic will defeat this absurd tribal lunacy. Holy meteorite? Nonsense. "

Islam has defied reason and destroyed civilization from its inception.

Intelligent, educated Muslims are better terrorists than primitive savages.

You are underestimating the power of this belief system.

Anonymous said...

Koran : 8:39 " Wage war on non-Muslims and kill them until they submit and the only religion is Islam". We have to stop them now! Vote and support the right people in office and kick those who are in bed with Islam like the one in the oval office.

Hesperado said...

A good essay overall, trencherbone (although I have a couple of quibbles).

Pace "traeh", I do agree with the "tribalism" meme; however, I would say that Islam, unlike all other tribes, is unique in that it is a "Super-Tribe" -- it assimilates other peoples and tribes into its expansionist digestive system, so to speak -- not in the interest of an open-ended tolerant Univeralism (qua the modern West), but in the interest of aggrandizing and strengthening its tribalistic center, whose entelechy is ultimately eschatological-imperialistic.

Which brings me to your Muslim demurrer (one of the "Anonymouses" above):

What a load of hogwash. Islam invites everyone to be a Muslim. A group with open membership is, by definition, not a tribe.

Sure, Islam invites everyone -- to be in the Super-Tribe. There are conditions for membership: ultimate loyalty to the Super-Tribe, against all who remain outside of it and do not support its aims.

Another word to use for Islam is "gang" -- or: "Super-Gang".

Abdullah said...

America has no chance of beating Islam. Islam is the last and final message of Allah and it will prevail over all those who oppose it in one way or another.

Anonymous said...

I say we should turn Mecca to radioactive dust

Richard Miller said...

My hat is off to whoever wrote this blog post. It is incredibly concise and right on the money. I will only say that there was an unnecessary leeway given to the "fair face of Christianity" The reality is that ALL religions are fucked and nearly all have blood on their hands. Muslims despite their penchant for bloodthirsty still have ways to catch up to the Christian body count. I recommend everyone read Christopher Hitchens "Go is NOT great" and Dawkins' "they god delusion". Religions belong in the Dark Ages when we used execute people for believing that the earth was not at the centre of the solar system.

Richard Miller said...

Saw typos, that's God is not great. And the God delusion,