Saturday, 23 January 2010

Islam = Terrorism

I see the threat level from 'international' terrorism has been raised to severe, but no-one's telling us why.

Well here's why, because...

Terrorism is intrinsic to Islam.

Islam cannot spread or even maintain itself without violence: violence to those who attempt to leave Islam, violence to those who criticise Islam, and violence to those who refuse to be subjugated by Islam.

Islam has been a terrorist cult since it was founded. Mohammed said "I have been made victorious with terror"

Now since Mohammed is 'the perfect man' and role model for all Muslims, it follows that terrorists have divine approval for what they do. All that stuff about a 'tiny minority of extremists' is a load of taqiyya. Terrorism is mainstream, bog-standard orthodox Islam. The more Muslims you have in a country, the greater the incidence of terrorism.

Obsessive hatred of infidels
"Islam is the only religion which is more obsessed with unbelievers than it is with its own followers. Muslims define their own identity solely in opposition to the Kuffar. Islamic accomplishments are so negligible that they have no positive cultural features with which they can identify. Hence the unceasing and implacable aggression toward civilized peoples and envy of their accomplishments. The development and deliberate cultivation of hatred is such a central feature of Islam that there is nothing that we Kuffars can do, or not do, that would make our univited guests hate us any less or any more.

Rage is so intrinsic to Islam that external events are irrelevant. Hatred of non-Moslems is the pivot of Islamic existence. Muslims are bound together by a shared and carefully nurtured animosity to 'The Other' developed from earliest childhood, which ignites a permanent fire of tension between Moslems and non-Moslems. Ever since Jihadists started immigrating into the West, we have become all too familiar with concepts such as 'Killing the unbelievers wherever you find them' and the tribal polarities of Dar al-Harb versus Dar al-Islam , Ummah versus Kuffar etc."

More at

Mohammed's fixation on infidels
"Very little of the Koran is devoted to how to be a Muslim, the religion of Islam. Instead, the majority of the Koran is about kafirs, non-Muslims. Kafirs are the worst of the creation. Allah hates kafirs and plots against them. Kafirs can be tortured, murdered, robbed, raped and enslaved. The Koran is fixated on kafirs, as was Mohammed.

To measure the Koranic fixation on kafirs, let us measure the fixation by counting the amount of text devoted to them. In Mecca an astounding 67% of the text is devoted to the kafir. In Medina 51% was about kafirs. The amount of text in the entire Koran devoted to kafirs is 61%.

As an aside, Islam excludes kafirs in every way from its religious practice. Since the kafir is outside of Islam, the term political Islam is used to describe the doctrine of Islam as it is applied to the "others", the kafirs. So 61% of the Koran is about political Islam, not religious Islam. (KS Lal gives the figure of 63% in Theory and Practice of Muslim State in India, Aditya Prakashan, 1999, N. Delhi, pg. 4).

The Sira shows the importance of Islam's political nature. Mohammed preached the religion of Islam for 13 years in Mecca and only gained 150 followers. He moved to Medina where he became a politician and warrior. After 10 years of violence he became ruler of all Arabia without a single enemy left standing. He was involved in an event of violence every 6 weeks for the last 9 years of his life. Statistical conclusion-Islam's success came from war and politics, not religion.

Another statistical conclusion: Islam is primarily a political doctrine, not a religion.

Simple statistics also reveal the true nature of the political/religious idea of jihad. When the word jihad is used, Muslims say that there are two kinds of jihad. There is the religious jihad, the greater jihad--the inner struggle against personal problems. The war jihad is the lesser jihad.

The Hadith of Bukhari gives all of the tactical details of jihad. A simple counting method shows that 3% of the hadiths are about the inner struggle, whereas, 97% of the hadiths are about jihad as war. So is jihad the inner struggle? Yes, 3%. Is jihad the war against kafirs? Yes, 97%.

This leads to a very important concept. Islam is based upon contradictory statements. How do we sort them out to get the complete meaning? We measure the amount of text devoted to each side of the dichotomy. That is what we did with the question of which jihad is the real jihad. It gives a complete statistical answer. "

More at

How a Robust and Confident Trinitarianism Can Destroy the Allah Myth
"Unlike most other religions, Islam didn't start off as a coherent body of doctrine. It began as the rantings and ravings of a psychopathic pedophile, which were altered according to the requirements of his debauched lifestyle. The Koran is full of internal contradictions, with the more violent verses 'abrogating' (i.e. cancelling) the more peaceful ones.

Nor was Islam spread by missionary efforts as with other religions. It was imposed by the sword by a thuggish bunch of robbers, rapists and murderers who were attracted by Mohammed's offer of divinely approved raids of rape and pillage.

Consequently, the later Muslims had to try to do a retrofit of theology and philosophy on to what was a pig's breakfast of garbled Jewish and Christian beliefs mixed up with Mohammed's ramblings and ravings. They soon gave up on the philosophy, and didn't do much better with the theology, which is no match for Christian Trinitarianism.

Rivers of Blood and Communalism
"In the days of the Raj, Brigadier Powell argued that India was not ready for independence, because of 'communalism', i.e. an overriding loyalty to a group that would prevent people being rational voters or accepting the majority decision when they were in a minority. The bloody, communal violence that accompanied Indian partition and independence confirmed his worst fears.

Powell feared that immigration would import communalism into Britain, eroding its homogeneous electorate and undermining its parliamentary system. In the early 1950s, Powell abandoned his imperialism, but he never discarded his fear of communalism and its potentially bloody consequences."

Hatred of non-Moslems is the pivot of Islamic existence.
V.S. Naipaul said "Hatred of non-Moslems is the pivot of Islamic existence. It not only declares all dissidents as the denizens of hell but also seeks to ignite a permanent fire of tension between Moslems and non-Moslems; it is far more lethal than Karl Marx's idea of social conflict which he hatched to keep his theory alive."

We are in the Domain of War
Muslims divide the world into Dar al-Islam - the lands where Islam reigns supreme, and Dar al-Harb - the domain of war which is as yet unconquered by Islam.


- Is the term 'Dar al-Harb' destined to be a self-fulfilling prophecy?

- Given this polarised theology, is Muslim aggression against the West inevitable?

- Is there anything we can do, short of abject surrender, that can permanently stop their aggression?

- Is Islamageddon, a clash of civilisations resulting in WWIII, unavoidable?

The Muslim world is seething with a thousand and one real and imagined grievances and resentments against the West.

They feel humiliated by the West's accomplishments compared with their own inbred backwardness. They want revenge for the Crusades, colonialism, cartoons, Israel, ice-cream wrappers, Salman Rushdie, science, piggy banks and all the other humiliations that they believe in their paranoid state that the kuffars have deliberately inflicted on them.

To Muslims, all relationships are of dominance/submission.

If they can't be dominant, they sulk, whine and claim victim status to sympathetic bleeding-heart liberals, while secretly nursing their pent-up fury and humiliation.

Once they think they might get the upper hand, the sulking immediately flips into murderous hostility.

So, kuffars, beware the coming Islamageddon. Once Muslims can take on the West there'll be an orgy of rape, murder, torture and mutilation that will make the two previous world wars seem like a family squabble. We need to shove Islam back into its box and nail the lid down before its too late for all of us.

Too terrible to contemplate
"They think the implications of the possibility that the Koran teaches warfare against unbelievers are too terrible to even contemplate. Thus, many policymakers simply assume the Koran teaches peace without bothering to study the text."

In FrontPage yesterday Jamie Glazov interviewed me about my new book, The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran. Here is an excerpt:

FP: Tell us how and why political correctness has made it almost impossible to discuss what is really in the Koran and in other Islamic texts.

Spencer: Political correctness would have us believe that the Koran is a book of peace, and that anyone who says otherwise is "bigoted," "hateful," and "Islamophobic."

But is it, really? What the Koran really says can easily be verified. If the Koran really curses Jews and Christians (9:30) and calls for warfare against them in order to bring about their subjugation (9:29), it is not "Islamophobic" to forewarn Infidels by pointing this out. It is simply a fact. And it should go without saying that it is not a fact that should move any reader of my book to hate anyone. The fact that the Koran counsels warfare against unbelievers should move readers to act in defense of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the legal equality of all people, before it is too late.

FP: How does the misinterpretation of what the Koran and other Muslim texts teach endanger our security?

Spencer: Most Western analysts dogmatically deny that the Koran teaches violence and supremacism. Yet Muslims who believe this comprise a global movement, active from Indonesia to Nigeria and extending into Europe and North America, that is dedicated to waging war against "unbelievers" - that is, non-Muslims - and subjugating them as inferiors under the rule of Islamic law. This movement sees in the Koran its divine mandate to wage that war.

In March 2009, five Muslims accused of helping plot the September 11 attacks, including the notorious Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, wrote an "Islamic Response to the Government's Nine Accusations." In it they quote the Koran to justify their jihad war against the American Infidels. "In God's book," asserts the letter, "he ordered us to fight you everywhere we find you, even if you were inside the holiest of all holy cities, The Mosque in Mecca, and the holy city of Mecca, and even during sacred months. In God's book, verse 9 [actually verse 5], Al-Tawbah [the Koran's 9th chapter]: Then fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, and besiege them and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush."

Moral equivalence is moral cowardice

Those people who use the 'moral equivalence argument' to compare Islam with other religions need to examine their own subconscious psychological motives. They are not only attempting to delude others, but are in deep denial and trying to delude themselves.

The conscious part of the argument takes the form "Christians and Jews have committed atrocities such as the McVeigh, Breivik and King David Hotel bombings, so Christianity and Judaism are just the same as Islam. Therefore Islam poses no special threat."

The fallacies are obvious: Christian and Jewish acts of terrorism are rare and infrequent; they are rejected by the majority of followers of the religions, go against the core teachings of the religions, and are committed by a few isolated loonies. In contrast, Islamic acts of terrorism are commonplace, are encouraged by the Koran and are supported, if not actually carried out, by a substantial proportion of Muslims.

The unconscious and self-deluding part of the moral equivalence argument is the refusal to face the fact that Islam is an intrisically violent totalitarian ideology that has infiltrated our civilization, and is bent on our conversion, subjugation or elimination. To acknowlege this would be deeply disturbing and well outside the comfort zone of most people (remember the popular enthusiasm for appeasement of Hitler and 'Peace in Our Time'?) . So we reassure ourselves, by the moral equivalence argument, that Islam is just like other religions.

It's far easier to stay in denial and regard Islam as being no more threat to our lives and culture than the Quakers or Lubavitcher Hasidim. That way we don't have to worry about the looming global clash of civizations, or think about the unpleasant courses of action that may be necessary to reduce the threat. We can leave that for our children to sort out.

You owe it to your children and grandchildren to understand Islam. Use Everything you need to know about Islam as a handy reference.


Christopher Logan said...

Nice site, keep up the good work!

The Pissed Off Citizen said...

I just saw your post to one of my posts and I replied to it. I'm not too clear on how the comment system works ( if it notifies you or not ) So I will continue here what I began there.

I went through your article and what I find interesting is, you don't do anything different from what other anti-islamic websites have done.

You base your knowledge on websites and heresy. You speak against a religion without ever reading the book that the religion stems from.

To prove what I mean, The one section where you quote certain verses of the Qur'an aren't even real.

Here are the correct verses:

[9:30] The Jews said, "Ezra is the son of GOD," while the Christians said, "Jesus is the son of GOD!" These are blasphemies uttered by their mouths. They thus match the blasphemies of those who have disbelieved in the past. GOD condemns them. They have surely deviated.

[9:29] You shall fight back against those who do not believe in GOD, nor in the Last Day, nor do they prohibit what GOD and His messenger have prohibited, nor do they abide by the religion of truth - among those who received the scripture - until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly.

Nowhere does it tell a Muslim to kill anyone or Jews specifically.
Nowhere in the Qur'an does it ever mention such a thing.

I went through your blog and saw some other interesting pieces, especially the part where you actually took the time out to use specific references to show how "Muslims" justify certain things.

Once again, your argument falls flat in all that time you wasted, why?
Because once again, you never even once quoted the actual Qur'an.

My friend, either learn from your mistakes or those in power will use it against people like you to play with your mind, pin you against others while they profit and benefit from your anger and ignorance.

Anonymous said...


Pixup said...

The Pissed Off Citizen said, "Nowhere does it tell a Muslim to kill anyone or Jews specifically. Nowhere in the Qur'an does it ever mention such a thing."

So, why are their religious leaders waving around a Qur'an screaming "Kill The Jews! Destroy Israel!"

It does mention killing of Jews, Christians and many more.

Muhammad is the perfect Muslim and he killed allot of people. Muslims aspire to be like Muhammad, in every way, because he was the perfect Muslim.

Here are a few tid-bits for you from the Qur'an on other issues:

Qur’an 59:16 “They [the Jews] are like Satan when he tells man, ‘Not to believe,’ When (man)
denies, Satan says, ‘I have nothing to do with you. I fear Allah, the Lord of men and jinn!’”

(Comparing Jews to Satan. Would you not want to destroy Satan?)

Qur’an 33:26 “Allah took down the People of the Scripture Book. He cast terror into their
hearts. Some you slew, and some you made prisoners. And He made you heirs of their
lands, their houses, and their goods, giving you a land which you had not traversed before.”
land you have not trodden.”

(Terrorize, Kill and Steal.)

Qur’an 9:3 “Allah is not bound by any contract or treaty with non-Muslims, nor is His Apostle.”

(Okay to Lie.)

Yep, It is good to know the Qur'an. It is loaded with gems!

Anonymous said...

Hello there, I haven't read your whole article but after Reading the first paragraph I felt it's my duty to comment and correct this guy! You said Islam teaches to torture kafirs or something like that. Wow, you really are misconcepted about Islam. Islam is the only religion that specifies it's believers to behave with non-muslims just as though you would with Muslims. Infact it says treat them better, so they too may be impressed with your religion. It actually places great emphasis on this. But wow I really do not know where your sources lie (media?) Aah anyway inshallah I'll read the rest of your article and correct.

IftikharA said...


British society is institutionally racist. A native child is born with the virus and genes of racism. This is the main reason why British schooling is the home of institutional racism. It is not only British society but even British establishment has made life difficult by treating Muslims with suspicion.

Native Brits believe that they are superior than people from other cultures and countries. A study by Essex University revealed a British negative view towards the nearly two-millio-strong Muslim community. British media gave a distorted picture of Muslims. British intelligence services spy on Muslims and place Muslim pilgrims under syrveillance. British media use Islamic sermons to justify attacks on Islam. Islam is spreading fast in Britian. Anti-Muslim campaigns in Britain is deep-rooted and had preceded the 9/11 nd 7/7 attacks

Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools because British education system is the home of institutional racism and British teachers are chicken racist.

Bilingual Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools with bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods. Muslim schools are not only faith institutions but Bilingual schools also. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school.

Bilingual Muslim children need to learn and be well versed in standard English to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. They also need to learn and be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other community languages to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of thewir literature and poetry. English is their economic language, while Arabic is a religious and Urdu and other community languages are their social and community languages.

A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit.
Iftikhar Ahmad

Prophet Attila said...

I applaud your efforts to educate the people who are resident citizens of the United States about the "clear and present danger" Islam poses on all of us here, who value our freedom and liberty
as well as those who have a duty as parents to understand Islam and gaudge for themselves the effect all this is going to have on their children, and their childrens, children!
I find the best way to learn about Islam is study the origin, in books such as "Everything You Need To Know About Islam" and the best way to learn about muslims, and what they really think and believe is to listen to them speaking amoungst themselves and speaking to them directly. If you are one who can see the transparency in will learn much in "Voice-Chat" with them.

marion said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


Anonymous said...

All the information written here about Islam Is 100 Percent Wrong and Baseless.The writer didn't understand even what islam is.U should tell all these things to Dr.Zakir Naik and ur mouth 'll be shut up by his answers.

Anonymous said...

Here is a Verse Of Quran which proves this whole information to be wrong.In Quran Surah No.60,Verse no.8 Allah(God) says " Allah does not forbid u from showing kindness And Dealing justly with those who have not fought u about religion And Have not driven u out of ur homes.Allah just love Dealers" The verse the writer has mentioned above is written in a wrong manner Allah just ordered Muslims to fight against those kafirs who wanted to hurt them and their religion.

Anonymous said...

"That person is not of us who invites others to aid him in oppression, and he is not of us who fights for his tribe in injustice, and he is not of us who dies assisting his tribe in tyranny." - Prophet Mohammed

"September 11 attacks"

NOBODY believes the official story about 9/11 anymore. You are about 8 years behind with your info.

Anonymous said...

"Incidents, accidents or deliberate acts of jihad?

What do you think? Let us know.
Sudden Jihad Syndrome

* A just-graduated student named Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, 22, and an Iranian immigrant, drove a sport utility vehicle into a crowded pedestrian zone. He struck nine people but, fortunately, none were severely injured.

Until his would-be murderous rampage, Taheri-azar, a philosophy and psychology major, had an apparently normal existence and promising future.

Read more…

Here are some more examples:
Sentence Fury Of Hit & Run Victim’s Family

The furious family of a young woman left for dead by a callous hit-and-run driver said they were “speechless” after the cold-blooded culprit was told he’d spend just six weeks in jail.

Pretty victim Amy Verlander, 22, was in a coma for three weeks after being brutally mowed down as she waited for a taxi and is still in a wheelchair seven months after the sickening smash.

Brave Amy, who works for the Independent Police Complaints Commission, has been in and out of hospital since the devastating collision on Burdett Road in Limehouse, east London, on September 2nd last year.

She was left with a catalogue of horrific injuries including a broken neck, spinal injuries, a punctured lung, fractured pelvis, crushed diaphragm, shattered ribs and a broken arm.

Mucj more at

Jim Baxter said...

"What is human?" GOD's answer...

Keven J. Hasson, President of the Becket Fund, recently stated, "...the American and Soviet systems...offered differing visions of freedom and human nature." The missing element in every human 'solution' is an accurate definition of the creature.

In the Bible, God's Word has accurately defined the human being as 'the earth creature endowed with the ability to choose.' His natural Rights, therefore, are merely an extension and application of natural human endowments, which all humans - everywhere in the world - possess. Even as goldfish, canaries, and puppy dogs require an environment based on their natural features, so humans require external freedom to fulfill their natural internal abilities of choice, selection, election, and consent. Uniquely, America was founded on this definitive paradigm in human nature. All nations should reject foundational human opinion that teaches otherwise.

Further, God's gift of criteria for choosing between alternatives supplies us with superior standards for successful visionary choice-making. Humans cannot invent (or replace) criteria greater than self, ACLU to the contrary.

Defining 'human' accurately is the first step in establishing accurate and successful environments, institutions, and creative relationships for earth's Choicemaker. Middle East governments, and all leaders, would do well to pay attention: nature and nature's Creator speak with an authoritative voice. Psalms 25:12 119:30, 173 Joel 3:14 Selah

No one is smarter than their criteria.

Jim Baxter Sgt. USMC WWII & Korean War semper fidelis

Jim Baxter said...

Each individual human being possesses a unique, highly developed, and
sensitive perception of variety. Thus aware, man is endowed with a natural
capability for enacting internal mental and external physical selectivity.
Quantitative and qualitative choice-making thus lends itself as the superior
basis of an active intelligence.

Human is earth's Choicemaker. His title describes his definitive and
typifying characteristic. Recall that his other features are but vehicles of
experience intent on the development of perceptive awareness and the
following acts of decision and choice. Note that the products of man cannot
define him for they are the fruit of the discerning choicemaking process and
include the cognition of self, the utility of experience, the development of
value measuring systems and language, and the acculturation of

The arts and the sciences of man, as with his habits, customs, and
traditions, are the creative harvest of his perceptive and selective powers.
Creativity, the creative process, is a choice-making process. His articles,
constructs, and commodities, however marvelous to behold, deserve neither
awe nor idolatry, for man, not his contrivance, is earth's own highest
expression of the creative process.

Human is earth's Choicemaker. The sublime and significant act of choosing
is, itself, the Archimedean fulcrum upon which man levers and redirects the
forces of cause and effect to an elected level of quality and diversity.
Further, it orients him toward a natural environmental opportunity, freedom,
and bestows earth's paradigm title, The Choicemaker, on his singular and
plural brow.

Human is earth's Choicemaker. Psalm 25:12 He is by nature and nature's God a
creature of Choice - and of Criteria. Psalm 119:30,173 His unique and
definitive characteristic is, and of Right ought to be, the natural
foundation of his environments, institutions, and respectful relations to
his fellow-man. Thus, he is oriented to a Freedom whose roots are in the
Order of the universe. selah

No one is smarter than their criteria.

Jim Baxter said...

Let us proclaim it. Behold!
The Season of Generation-Choicemaker

"I should think that if there is one thing that man has learned about
himself it is that he is a creature of choice." Richard M. Weaver

"Man is a being capable of subduing his emotions and impulses; he can
rationalize his behavior. He arranges his wishes into a scale, he chooses;
in short, he acts. What distinguishes man from beasts is precisely that he
adjusts his behavior deliberately." Ludwig von Mises

"To make any sense of the idea of morality, it must be presumed that the
human being is responsible for his actions and responsibility cannot be
understood apart from the presumption of freedom of choice." John

"The advocate of liberty believes that it is complementary of the orderly
laws of cause and effect, of probability and of chance, of which man is not
completely informed. It is complementary of them because it rests in part
upon the faith that each individual is endowed by his Creator with the power
of individual choice." Wendell J. Brown

"These examples demonstrate a basic truth -- that human dignity is embodied
in the free choice of individuals." Condoleeza Rice

"Our Founding Fathers believed that we live in an ordered universe. They
believed themselves to be a part of the universal order of things. Stated
another way, they believed in God. They believed that every man must find
his own place in a world where a place has been made for him. They sought
independence for their nation but, more importantly, they sought freedom for
individuals to think and act for themselves. They established a republic
dedicated to one purpose above all others - the preservation of individual
liberty..." Ralph W. Husted

"We have the gift of an inner liberty so far-reaching that we can choose
either to accept or reject the God who gave it to us, and it would seem to
follow that the Author of a liberty so radical wills that we should be
equally free in our relationships with other men. Spiritual liberty
logically demands conditions of outer and social freedom for its
completion." Edmund A. Opitz

"Above all I see an ability to choose the better from the worse that has
made possible life's progress." Charles Lindbergh

"Freedom is the Right to Choose, the Right to create for oneself the
alternatives of Choice. Without the possibility of Choice, and the exercise
of Choice, a man is not a man but a member, an instrument, a thing." Thomas Jefferson

Jim Baxter said...

Q: "What is man that You are mindful of him, and the son of man that You
visit him?" Psalm 8:4
A: "I call heaven and earth as witnesses today against you, that I have set
before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that
both you and your descendants may live." Deuteronomy 30:19

Q: "Lord, what is man, that You take knowledge of him? Or the son of man,
that you are mindful of him?" Psalm 144:3
A: "And if it seems evil to you to serve the Lord, choose for yourselves
this day whom you will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served
that were on the other side of the river, or the gods of the Amorites, in
whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."
Joshua 24:15

Q: "What is man, that he could be pure? And he who is born of a woman, that
he could be righteous?" Job 15:14
A: "Who is the man that fears the Lord? Him shall He teach in the way he
chooses." Psalm 25:12

Q: "What is man, that You should magnify him, that You should set Your heart
on him?" Job 7:17
A: "Do not envy the oppressor and choose none of his ways." Proverbs 3:31

Q: "What is man that You are mindful of him, or the son of man that You take
care of him?" Hebrews 2:6
A: "I have chosen the way of truth; your judgments I have laid before me."
Psalm 119:30 "Let Your hand become my help, for I have chosen Your
precepts."Psalm 119:173

Genesis 3:3,6 Deuteronomy 11:26-28; 30:19 Job 5:23 Isaiah 7:14-15; 13:12;
61:1 Amos 7:8 Joel 3:14 Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 Psalms 25:12 119:1-176

Sir Isaac Newton
The greatest scientist in human history, a Bible-Believing Christian, an
authority on the Bible's Book of Daniel, committed to individual value and
individual liberty

Anonymous said...

A little advice to the racist muslim nation, if you move to another country do not expect them to put their needs before yours. If you want that go back to your 3rd world sand pit in hell aka mecca. Brits have more say and more rights to be happy in their own country than you do. They were born there so they have the right to the best of everything. You pitiful ungrateful scum that worship a child molester (muhammad piss be upon him) seem to think that you have full right to anything you want. WRONG. Know your place and stay there. You are behind the Brits. And deserve nothing. By the way people bathe for a reason you all should bathe at least once a day. You smell and that cologne is making it worse.

Anonymous said...

"Brits have more say and more rights to be happy in their own country than you do. They were born there so they have the right to the best of everything"

And what about the Muslims who ARE Brits? Most of the Muslims in Britain were born here. And what about converts? There are hundreds of thousands of British converts to Islam, and more every day. Of course you never thought about them, because in your screwed up mind, a Muslim is defined racially. I bet you passed at least ten Muslims on the street today that you didn't even know were Muslims just because they had white skin. Racist.

Anonymous said...

May the Final Crusade begin and end with the slaughter of Islam and it's Satan worshiping followers. Religion of peace? Rot in hell where there is no peace, just the way you like it.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Zakir had a fatwa on his head by other muslims lol...

Anonymous said...

All Muslims are fucken Pedo Scum!

Anonymous said...

We Muslims,are all Pedo Scum? Honestly..judging a whole race by some asssumptions that don't make sense. This is to the maker of the site.. your formula Islam = Terrosim is incorrect. It goes like this

Stupid people who think every muslim is a terrosit + this website and many others = A misimformed crowd.

Read the Quran word for word,and you will realize that Muslims,do not believe in killing one another

Kdk said...

No they believe in killing non-Muslims. The Muslim appologists on this site are uninformed about their own religion or they are simply lying. Most likely the later.